
Sometimes, when I'm watching an Eagles game, my dad comes in and asks, "What inning is it?" He knows that only baseball games have innings, and he could probably tell you that football games have four quarters. When he asks something like that, he's usually joking.
When the camera features a shot of the opposing team's coach, though, it's a different (and telling) story. Let's say I'm watching football and there's a closeup of rosy-cheeked New York Giants coach Tom Coughlin. My dad will look at him and say, "Who is that man?" And this time, he's serious. He really doesn't know. My dad is what I would call a non-fan. He doesn't follow sports, doesn't care about them, and only watches them to participate in a family or social dynamic.
Most sports fans find non-fans annoying. Non-fans ask questions about basic rules. (Why was that a penalty?!) They make seemingly irrelevant observations. (This field has dirt between the mound and home plate!) And they generally exude frustration and resentment over having to sit through a three hour game that you care about WAY too much.
That being acknowledged, sports fans, I'm asking you to give the non-fans a chance, and I'm telling you it's for your own good.
Fans can learn from non-fans, and vice versa. The key is to never dismiss a non-fan for their lack of knowledge. You watch Sportscenter just as religiously as your girlfriend watches the Hills. It's easy to belittle or ignore non-fans for what they don't know. It's more interesting to find out what they do.
For example, if ESPN has breaking news that Sidney Crosby is, in fact, a woman, and a non-fan has never heard of Sid the Kid, that gives you an indication of how the NHL is doing these days. Many non-fans have never heard of Alex Ovechkin either, but you can be damn sure they've heard of Lebron James. Non-fans can help you gauge how far an athlete's celebrity extends beyond their sport. Once your mom can name more than two players in the NHL, you'll know the league is stepping up their marketing game.*
Non-fans can also be useful observers during game time. Yes, their questions can be annoying. But they can also challenge you as a fan. Where do you draw the line between a charge and a blocking foul? Why do the rules seem different for that in the last two minutes? Shouldn't rules be the same the whole game no matter what? Non-fans may leave you stumped, but they can also help clue you in. While you're paying attention to balls and strikes, they're paying attention to how nervous the rookie pitcher looks. They point it out, he gives up a home run. In some sense, they can see it coming when you can't. A non-fan's lack of interest in the game itself often leads them to insights that are lost on a fan following every play.
Listen, I'm a fan. I know that sometimes it feels like non-fans will just never understand. And maybe, for certain aspects of sports, they won't. They'll probably never understand why a win can make your day and a loss can ruin it. Or why you care how Pedro Martinez pitched in a fake game. When it feels like that, just try to remember that they view sports the same way you view The Hills. Who gives a flying fuck that Heidi broke a nail and Spencer like totally ignored her? Well, who gives a rat's ass that Brett Favre and Brad Childress are sexting each other?
All I know is, if we're going to a watch a three hour game together, we might as well make the most of it. We may not always see eye to eye, but all I am saying, is give non-fans a chance.
*Thanks to Kate, with whom I had this exact conversation, for her enlightening perspective as a non-fan
In this wildly oversimplified and overdramatized depiction of a common social 'dichotomy', you failed to acknowledge the existence a similarly one-dimensional and archetypal character: one who possesses a comprehensive understanding of the game's rules, from past attempts at PLAYING the game, but has no interest in experiencing success vicariously through the physical triumphs of a societally detrimental meathead. COMPRENDE BIYATCHHHH!?
ReplyDeleteey yakob,
ReplyDeleteIf you are going to argue that I left out one type of a non-fan, you might as well point out that I left out all the different types. I am happy to acknowledge that there are many different tiers of both fans and non-fans. One of the non-fan archetypes is the one you mentioned, someone who had to play sports throughout their childhood but doesn't care for them now. Non-fans vary in their degree of ignorance and tolerance, as do fans.
The point of this post was not to break down all the different categories. That would have muddled the overall point, which is that fans should try to be more accepting of non-fans, as it can be to their benefit and make for a better fanhood.
How do you feel about the differing virtues of non-fans and overly zealous ones? For example, some of us know a pair of overly zealous fans, one is a Yankees fan who once screamed at Johnny Damon through a common room TV for striking out from on top of a couch, and the other who frequently breaks his own possessions when the Red Sox are not doing well.
ReplyDeleteAlthough this type of fan can supply all of the stats on any player involved in the game and provide great insight, but sometimes it is a little much.
Its a different kind of frustration than watching with non fans. Here is the question I pose to you Mr. Yarnell, if you had to choose between watching an Eagles Cowboys game with 4 other people and they must either be utterly bewildered non fans or the overly zealous type (a mix 2 and 2, or if not a mix then assume that the team who they support loses the game)?
You make a good point, sir.
ReplyDeleteEven though I'm preaching patience with the non-fans, thus implying they don't irk me quite as much as they do some people, I'd still pick the overly zealous fans. It gets dicey though, when a huge fan supports the opposing team of the one you root for. If I watch an Eagles/Cowboys game with a Cowboys fan and the Eagles lose, I need to leave the situation before I say something in anger I'll regret. You may have witnessed this behavior with a certain Eagles/Giants game last year. Of course, it's incredibly satisfying if the Eagles win, but then I run the risk of being an asshole. Either way though, I'm going to be overly-emotional, so I would prefer to watch those kinds of games with other crazy fans.
what is sexting. text message sexing?
ReplyDeleteSort of. The most extreme version is when people send naked pictures to each other's phones. This article is a pretty quick read: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/01/15/national/main4723161.shtml
ReplyDeleteYou know my thoughts on the matter. I am a fan of a certain AFC team and therefore may be said to have less right to hate them than you do, but I do hold the sincere hope that President Obama will take the visionary step of installing a scorpion pit somewhere on the Whitehouse grounds in which to deposit douchebag Cowboys fans. They are a blight on our society.
ReplyDelete